<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Queensland&#8217;s Matilda Awards 2009: where to now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://actorsgreenroom.net/archives/485/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://actorsgreenroom.net/archives/485</link>
	<description>Queensland&#039;s Professional Theatre: curation and conversation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:33:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Here come &#8230; or there go the Matildas: 2011 — Greenroom</title>
		<link>http://actorsgreenroom.net/archives/485/comment-page-1#comment-9027</link>
		<dc:creator>Here come &#8230; or there go the Matildas: 2011 — Greenroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 06:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actorsgreenroom.net/?p=485#comment-9027</guid>
		<description>[...] Queensland&#8217;s Matilda Awards &#8211; where to now? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Queensland&#8217;s Matilda Awards &#8211; where to now? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And now for the Matildas! — Greenroom</title>
		<link>http://actorsgreenroom.net/archives/485/comment-page-1#comment-2369</link>
		<dc:creator>And now for the Matildas! — Greenroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actorsgreenroom.net/?p=485#comment-2369</guid>
		<description>[...] the Matildas, since 1987 Queensland&#8217;s only awards for excellence in theatre production.  That post put a few questions about the nature, scope and range of work under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Matildas, since 1987 Queensland&#8217;s only awards for excellence in theatre production.  That post put a few questions about the nature, scope and range of work under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Backstrom</title>
		<link>http://actorsgreenroom.net/archives/485/comment-page-1#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Backstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actorsgreenroom.net/?p=485#comment-440</guid>
		<description>I agree that the awards should revert to the old structure. I am not sure why they have gone they way they have as I find it problematical. We don&#039;t have the sheer mass of theatre that other places have to justify splitting into categories. The more categories we have, the more people demand, to have their area of expertise fairly recognised, the more convoluted it all becomes. Not to mention, as Kate rightly points out, the more expensive becomes.

I also think they should be named Brisbane awards as that is what they cover. I cannot see a way for regional theatre to be properly recognised under the current structure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the awards should revert to the old structure. I am not sure why they have gone they way they have as I find it problematical. We don&#8217;t have the sheer mass of theatre that other places have to justify splitting into categories. The more categories we have, the more people demand, to have their area of expertise fairly recognised, the more convoluted it all becomes. Not to mention, as Kate rightly points out, the more expensive becomes.</p>
<p>I also think they should be named Brisbane awards as that is what they cover. I cannot see a way for regional theatre to be properly recognised under the current structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

